Legal Writing: Why “Shall” Is Being Replaced - engllish.com

Legal Writing: Why “Shall” Is Being Replaced

Get the IELTS score you need🚀

Prepare for IELTS with the Test experts
Flexible pricing
Live online group and private classes
Available 24/7
Product of British Council . kuksha is an affiliate of British Council.

“Shall” once ruled legal contracts. Now it’s being phased out. Discover why—and what’s replacing it.


📜 Introduction

For decades, the word “shall” was the king of legal documents. It showed up in contracts, policies, statutes, and legal letters—often used to signal obligation. But legal experts and courts have increasingly turned against “shall”, calling it ambiguous, outdated, and dangerously misleading.

In this article, we’ll explore:

  • Why “shall” is falling out of favor
  • What’s replacing it in modern legal writing
  • What legal professionals, writers, and even ESL learners should know

🔍 What’s the Problem With “Shall”?

At first glance, “shall” might seem like the perfect word for legal writing. It sounds formal, traditional, and serious. But that’s exactly the problem: it sounds clear—but isn’t.

Legal experts argue that “shall” has too many meanings:

  • It can suggest obligation (“You shall pay the fee”)
  • It can indicate futurity (“The meeting shall take place tomorrow”)
  • It can imply permission (“Shall we proceed?”)
  • It can be interpreted as a promise, command, or suggestion—depending on the context

This ambiguity has caused major issues in court interpretations and contract disputes.


⚖️ Court Cases That Proved the Point

Here are some examples where the word “shall” became a legal landmine:

  • In Federal Crop Insurance Corp. v. Merrill, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that “shall” can sometimes mean “may”, depending on the context.
  • In another case, Duggins v. Board of Education, the court stated that “shall” was used to mean future tense, not obligation—contradicting the drafter’s intent.

📢 Bottom line: When courts can’t agree on what “shall” means, it’s time to reconsider using it.


✅ 1. Must – Clear and Forceful

  • Most legal style guides now recommend “must” to express obligation. ✅ Example: “The tenant must pay rent on the first of each month.” This is clear, modern, and unambiguous.

✅ 2. Will – Expresses Future Action

  • Use “will” to refer to what someone intends or agrees to do. ✅ Example: “The company will send quarterly updates to the board.” It indicates intent, not obligation—perfect for commitments, not duties.

✅ 3. May / May Not – For Permissions

  • When giving permission or stating options, “may” is more accurate than “shall.” ✅ Example: “The landlord may enter the property with 24 hours’ notice.”

📘 Style Guides That Support the Shift

  • U.S. Federal Plain Language Guidelines: Recommends replacing “shall” with “must,” “will,” or other clear verbs.
  • SEC’s Plain English Handbook: Advises against using “shall” due to ambiguity.
  • Australian Government Style Manual: Recommends “must” instead of “shall.”
  • Bryan A. Garner (legal writing expert): Famously called “shall” “the most misused word in law.”

If you’re drafting contracts, agreements, or internal policies:

IntentUse This Instead of “Shall”
Legal obligationmust
Future actionwill
Permission or possibilitymay / may not
Recommendationshould
Condition or contingencyif / unless

💡 Real-Life Comparison

OLD (Confusing)

“The consultant shall provide reports within 10 days.”

NEW (Clear)

“The consultant must provide reports within 10 days.”


If you’re learning English or working in a legal/business environment:

  • Recognize that “shall” is now rare outside formal documents.
  • Use “must” and “will” confidently—they’re widely accepted and easier to understand.
  • When reading contracts or legal terms, pay attention to context—if you see “shall,” double-check what it actually means.

✅ Conclusion: A Shift Toward Clarity

The movement away from “shall” is about more than grammar—it’s about making legal writing:

  • Clearer
  • Fairer
  • More accessible

As contracts become more global and inclusive, plain language wins. “Shall” is being replaced—one contract at a time.


📦 Bonus Resources

🧠 Template Pack: Contracts Using “Must,” “Will,” and “May” for Clarity

📥 Download: Shall vs Must Legal Language Cheat Sheet (PDF)

🧑‍🏫 Mini-course: Modern Legal English: Drafting in Plain Language

Your personalised Study Plan

📥 Get your FREE 2025 Printable Tracker & Weekly Study Plan Template here:
👉 [Download PDF Now]

Quiz

Adjective Clause Workbook: Fill the form below to get your practice eBook.

Error: Contact form not found.

Choose the right package to support your IELTS success

Get the IELTS score you need🚀

Prepare for IELTS with the Test experts
Flexible pricing
Live online group and private classes
Available 24/7
Product of British Council . kuksha is an affiliate of British Council.

Adrianna Mosby
0 0 votes
Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted

Community

For Professionals

For Businesses

Let’s move the world forward with education.

We empower every kind of student — to learn and create success by learning English. 

Community

engllish.com
Logo
Register New Account
Compare items
  • Total (0)
Compare
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
Ninja Silhouette 9 hours ago

Joe Doe in London, England purchased a

Joe Doe in London?

Joe Doe in London, England purchased a

Joe Doe in London?

Joe Doe in London, England purchased a

Joe Doe in London?

Joe Doe in London, England purchased a

Shopping cart